project: Reassessing ancient Egyptian crops, crop husbandry and the agrarian landscape

Tools

  • Microsoft Access
  • Click the links above to find tools that are described on arts-humanities.net.

Subject Domains

  • Archaeology
  • Click the links above to find projects in the same subject areas.

Content Types

Project start date: 2003-11 Project end date: 2006-11

The main focus of the project is to provide a well-integrated reassessment of the diversity, distribution and use of Egyptian crops, crop husbandry and the agrarian landscape through the systematic compilation and analysis of Egyptian archaeobotanical data which will also be integrated with the textual, artistic and ethnohistorical evidence for crops and other species in order to create a more powerful methodology for understanding the complex processes of ancient Egyptian agriculture than the use of any single source of evidence alone. Although derived from often disparate datasets, the database aims to provide a consistent baseline for a direct comparison between taxa, sites, periods, and regions, types of preservation, etc. There is no doubt that the objective and replicable models produced by the recording and integration of the archaeobotanical and Egyptological datasets will have relevance to broader themes in archaeology, Egyptology, archaeobotany, agronomy, environmental landscape studies, etc.

Method information: 
Click on the links in the table below for more information about methods and categories.

Methods usedCategory
Data modellingData structuring and enhancement
Manual input and transcriptionData capture
Record linkagesData structuring and enhancement
Record linkagesData analysis
Searching and queryingData analysis
Statistical analysisData analysis
Funding sources: 
Arts and Humanities Research Board (AHRB)
Source material used: 

The data are derived from archaeobotanical site reports, articles and books (of which I have assembled a comprehensive bibliography), as well as my own archaeobotanical research on several Egyptian sites. I have made trips to Egypt to add my own field data, locate site reports, confer with other archaeobotanists working in Egypt and investigate other botanical databases based on (modern) Egyptian plants. Evidence from the artistic, textual and ethnohistorical records found in the Egyptological literature which relate to the crops and other species included in the database, as well as to agricultural techniques and crop husbandry are also included. This information is all manually added to the database.

Digital resource created: 

The project is focused on creating an Access database which will be used to compare archaeobotanical data between sites and also relate these data to other types of evidence, such as the artistic, textual and ethnohistorical records for the species present. The data recorded in the database includes:
Site
Sample #
Region
Latitude & longitude
Phase (e.g. - range of Dynasties covered by site)
Period - (e.g. - Old Kingdom, Late Period, Ptolemaic)
Site type - (e.g. - Urban - large scale town; Tomb - rural, elite)
Dating method - (e.g. - C14, King’s list, mud sealings, scarabs, stratigraphy)
Recovery method - (e.g. - machine or bucket flotation, dry sieved, hand picked)
Smallest sieve size used for recovery
Volume of soil sample (in litres)
Number of samples per site
Number of taxa per sample
Number of items per sample
Percentage of sample sorted
Taxa group (i.e. – cereal, legume, fruit, weed, etc.)
Whether or not animal dung is present (a common fuel source)
Preservation type - (e.g. - charred, desiccated, mineralised, waterlogged)
Context type - (e.g. - floor, hearth, pit fill, etc.)
Context class - (e.g. - house - occupation; public - storage, etc.)
Entity - (e.g. - house, bakery, storage area)
Interior or Exterior - (whether found inside or outside a structure)
Plant part - (e.g. seed, fruit, root, flower head, pod, etc.)
ID level - (e.g. Family, genus, species, including cf. identifications)
Abundance - (a scale of 1 to 5000+)
Yearly habit of taxa - (e.g. - annual, perennial, biennial)
Growth habit of taxa - (e.g. - erect, climbing, sprawling)
Habitat preference of taxa - (e.g. - cereal field, wet areas, waste places)
Phytogeographical zone of taxa - (e.g. – Mediterranean, Saharo-Arabian)
Use of taxa - (e.g. as food, animal fodder, fuel, building materials, temper)
Associations of taxa - (e.g. in the artistic, textual, ethnographic records)
Types of evidence used - (in terms of artistic, textual, ethnographic, etc.)

Data Formats created: 
Metadata information: 
Metadata used? no. 

Institutions affiliated with this project: 

UK HE institutions involved:
University College London

Project staff and expertise: 

Principal staff member:Professor Peter Ucko
Other staff:Postdoctoral researcher(s) / Research assistant(s)
External expertise:





Metadata on this arts-humanities.net record
Author(s) of recordMary Anne Murray
TitleReassessing ancient Egyptian crops, crop husbandry and the agrarian landscape
Record created2005-11-07
Record updated2010-01-27 15:08
URL of recordhttp://www.arts-humanities.net/node/2207
Citation of recordMary Anne Murray: Reassessing ancient Egyptian crops, crop husbandry and the agrarian landscape. <http://www.arts-humanities.net/node/2207> created: 2005-11-07, last updated 2010-01-27 15:08
Syndicate content
JISC logo AHRC logo King's College London logo